Skip to main content

Chhajju Ram Vs. Neki Ram & Others

Chhajju Ram Vs. Neki Ram & Others Subject matter of the case - What is the meaning of "Any other sufficient cause" and principle "of Ejusdem Generis" under Order 47 Rule 1 C.P.C. ? Facts of the case -  1. On 22nd October, 1912 one Mr. Chhajju Ram purchased certain lands of villages Kasgar and Jammi Kera from Mrs. Forbes for Rs. 42,000/- Mr. Chhajju Ram also took the possession of the above properties after the execution of the sale deed in his favour. 2. Neki Ram and others filed a suit against Chhajju Ram alleging that the execution of the above sale deed in favour of the defendant is collusive hence the same be declared null and void and the plaintiffs be given the possession of the said land on payment of Rs. 15,000/- on the basis of their preemptions. It was argued by the plaintiffs that :- i. The plaintiffs are Gaur Brahmins by caste and are the occupancy tenants of village Kasgar and were the members of Agriculture Tribes within the meaning...
Post a Comment

Meaning of Arbitral award, Rules applicable, Time limit for arbitration

Meaning of Arbitral award, Rules applicable, Time limit for arbitration 

Arbitral Award :- U/s. 2(1)(c) the term 'Arbitral Award ' is not defined but it states that the 'Arbitral Award' includes an interim award. Although S. 31(6) submits explanation in this regard as under -
The 'Arbitral tribunal' may, at any time during the arbitral proceedings, make an arbitration award on any matters with respect to which it may make a final arbitral award. Thus, an interim award may be the Arbitral Award. So, an interim award may be a final award.
 According to H.Lexicon - 'It is an instrument which embodies a decision of an arbitrator, arbitrator's as regards matters referred to him or them'.
An award, whether it is arbitral or interim is a decision of the arbitrator or arbitrators which is determined after contentious of the parties considered and an arbitrator or the arbitrators put his or their opinion in the form of decision. The consent of the parties may not be present in a decision. An arbitral award decided by the arbitral institution judicially which will have binding effect in respect of the parties in dispute.
The contents of an arbitral award must be in writing, not oral. An arbitral award is like a decree which comes into effect from the date on which it has been signed and right of the related parties come in to effect from the date onward.
Any agent on behalf of the parties to dispute if authorised by the parties may refer to arbitration for settlement of matter.

Essentials of Arbitral Award :-
1. It must be written.
2. The parties must be competent to arbitration.
3. The arbitration agreement must be fit to assign dispute before any domestic tribunals.
4. The decision of domestic tribunal must be written.
5. The contents of an award must be the subject matter of the arbitration.
6. The award must be determined on principles of natural justice.
7. The arbitrator must sign while giving award and also mention date therein.

Time limit for arbitral award :-
As per the 2015 amendments, an award has to be made within a period of 12 months from the date the arbitral tribunal is appointed and such period may be extended by a maximum period of 6 months by the parties. For any subsequent extension, an application to the court would need to be made.

Rules applicable and substance of dispute in arbitral award:-
Section 28 of the Arbitration and conciliation Act, 1996 provides rules which are applicable to the substance of dispute. It specifies the law or the rules of law according to which the arbitral tribunal shall decide the dispute submitted for arbitration.

Source :- unique 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Chhajju Ram Vs. Neki Ram & Others

Chhajju Ram Vs. Neki Ram & Others Subject matter of the case - What is the meaning of "Any other sufficient cause" and principle "of Ejusdem Generis" under Order 47 Rule 1 C.P.C. ? Facts of the case -  1. On 22nd October, 1912 one Mr. Chhajju Ram purchased certain lands of villages Kasgar and Jammi Kera from Mrs. Forbes for Rs. 42,000/- Mr. Chhajju Ram also took the possession of the above properties after the execution of the sale deed in his favour. 2. Neki Ram and others filed a suit against Chhajju Ram alleging that the execution of the above sale deed in favour of the defendant is collusive hence the same be declared null and void and the plaintiffs be given the possession of the said land on payment of Rs. 15,000/- on the basis of their preemptions. It was argued by the plaintiffs that :- i. The plaintiffs are Gaur Brahmins by caste and are the occupancy tenants of village Kasgar and were the members of Agriculture Tribes within the meaning...
Post a Comment
Read more

Theory of Corporate Personality - Company Law - Saloman v. Saloman - Lee v. Lee

 Theory of Corporate Personality - Company Law - Saloman v. Saloman - Lee v. Lee For doing a business, why people make a company? because apart from individual company has its own individual rights and advantages. In this article we will understand about "Corporate Personality" an important topic of Company law look, when ever a company is incorporated, apart from members, company has its own Legal Personality and Independent status means after incorporation, member and company separate from each other, they become a separate entity. This concept of separation is called as Corporate personality.  How this concept was developed and most importantly what is the usage of this concept, we will get to know about this from this three important case laws. The concept of Corporate Personality or Legal Personality was developed in the case of OAKES V. TURQUAND . But this concept was concreted or fully established in the case of SALOMON V. SALOMON CO LTD . Lets discuss about t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Territorial Jurisdiction U/S. 21, 38, 47 of Civil Procedure Code (C.P.C.)

Hira Lal Patni Vs. Shri Kali Nath Subject matter of the case - Whether the objection regarding territorial jurisdiction U/S. 21, 38 & 47 C.P.C., goes to the root of the jurisdiction of the court? Whether the validity of a decree can be challenged on that ground in execution proceedings? Facts of the case :- 1. Hira Lal Patni wanted to purchase the shares of "John Mill" of Agra. He took the services of Mr. Kali Nath for this purpose. 2. On 10th July, 1946 with the aid of Mr. Kali Nath, Hira Lal Patni along with one another purchased the entire interest of one Major A.U. Khan. 3. After seeking the permission U/S. 12 of Letters Patent Act, Mr. Kali Nath filed a suit No. 3718.47 against Hira Lal Patni in Bombay High Court for the recovery of his commission amounting to one Lakh Rupees. 4. High Court referred the dispute to an arbitrator namely Mr. W.E. Pereira, who was the administrator of the property of the deceased Major A.U. John. 5. The defendant cont...
Post a Comment
Read more