Skip to main content

Chhajju Ram Vs. Neki Ram & Others

Chhajju Ram Vs. Neki Ram & Others Subject matter of the case - What is the meaning of "Any other sufficient cause" and principle "of Ejusdem Generis" under Order 47 Rule 1 C.P.C. ? Facts of the case -  1. On 22nd October, 1912 one Mr. Chhajju Ram purchased certain lands of villages Kasgar and Jammi Kera from Mrs. Forbes for Rs. 42,000/- Mr. Chhajju Ram also took the possession of the above properties after the execution of the sale deed in his favour. 2. Neki Ram and others filed a suit against Chhajju Ram alleging that the execution of the above sale deed in favour of the defendant is collusive hence the same be declared null and void and the plaintiffs be given the possession of the said land on payment of Rs. 15,000/- on the basis of their preemptions. It was argued by the plaintiffs that :- i. The plaintiffs are Gaur Brahmins by caste and are the occupancy tenants of village Kasgar and were the members of Agriculture Tribes within the meaning...

What do you mean by Decree, Essentials of Decree, Kinds of Decree

What do you mean by Decree, Essentials of Decree, Kinds of Decree



What do you mean by "Decree"

According to Section 2 of Civil Procedure Code(CPC), " Decree means the formal expression of an adjudication which, so far as regards the court expressing it, conclusively determines the rights of the parties with reference to all or any of the matters in controversy within the suit and should be either preliminary or final. It shall be deemed to incorporate the rejection of an plaint and therefore the determination of any question within Section 144, but shall not include:
A. Any adjudication from which an appeal lies as an approval from an order, or
B. Any order of dismissal from default.

What are the essentials of a Decree?

1. There must be an adjudication 
2. Such adjudication must have been given in a suit 
3. It must have determined the rights of the parties with regards to all or any or any of the matters in controversy within the suit.
4. Such determination must be of a conclusive nature 
5. There must be a proper expression of such adjudication.

Kinds of Decrees (Classes)

i. Preliminary decree
ii. Final decree
iii. Partly preliminary and Partly final

Preliminary Decree

Where an adjudication decides the rights of the parties with regard to all or any of the matters in controversy in the suit, but doesn't completely dispose of the suit, it is a preliminary decree. A preliminary decree is passed in those cases in which the court has first to adjudicate upon the rights of the parties and has then to say it's hands for the nonce , until it's during a position to pass a final decree within the suit.

Final Decree

A decree may be set to be final in two ways-
a) When within the prescribed period no appeal is filed against the decree or the matter has been decided by the decree of the highest court. And
b) When the decree thus far as regards the court passing it, completely disposes of the suit.

Partly Preliminary and Partly Final Decree

A decree may be partly preliminary and partly final: e.g., in a suit for possession of immovable property with mesne profits, the court:-
I) Decrees possession of the property; and
II) Directs an inquiry into the mesne profits.
The former a part of the decree is final, while the later part is merely preliminary because the ultimate decree for mesne profits are often drawn only after enquiry, and the amount due is ascertained. In such a case, even though the decree is only one, it is partly preliminary and partly final.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Chhajju Ram Vs. Neki Ram & Others

Chhajju Ram Vs. Neki Ram & Others Subject matter of the case - What is the meaning of "Any other sufficient cause" and principle "of Ejusdem Generis" under Order 47 Rule 1 C.P.C. ? Facts of the case -  1. On 22nd October, 1912 one Mr. Chhajju Ram purchased certain lands of villages Kasgar and Jammi Kera from Mrs. Forbes for Rs. 42,000/- Mr. Chhajju Ram also took the possession of the above properties after the execution of the sale deed in his favour. 2. Neki Ram and others filed a suit against Chhajju Ram alleging that the execution of the above sale deed in favour of the defendant is collusive hence the same be declared null and void and the plaintiffs be given the possession of the said land on payment of Rs. 15,000/- on the basis of their preemptions. It was argued by the plaintiffs that :- i. The plaintiffs are Gaur Brahmins by caste and are the occupancy tenants of village Kasgar and were the members of Agriculture Tribes within the meaning...

Theory of Corporate Personality - Company Law - Saloman v. Saloman - Lee v. Lee

 Theory of Corporate Personality - Company Law - Saloman v. Saloman - Lee v. Lee For doing a business, why people make a company? because apart from individual company has its own individual rights and advantages. In this article we will understand about "Corporate Personality" an important topic of Company law look, when ever a company is incorporated, apart from members, company has its own Legal Personality and Independent status means after incorporation, member and company separate from each other, they become a separate entity. This concept of separation is called as Corporate personality.  How this concept was developed and most importantly what is the usage of this concept, we will get to know about this from this three important case laws. The concept of Corporate Personality or Legal Personality was developed in the case of OAKES V. TURQUAND . But this concept was concreted or fully established in the case of SALOMON V. SALOMON CO LTD . Lets discuss about t...

Territorial Jurisdiction U/S. 21, 38, 47 of Civil Procedure Code (C.P.C.)

Hira Lal Patni Vs. Shri Kali Nath Subject matter of the case - Whether the objection regarding territorial jurisdiction U/S. 21, 38 & 47 C.P.C., goes to the root of the jurisdiction of the court? Whether the validity of a decree can be challenged on that ground in execution proceedings? Facts of the case :- 1. Hira Lal Patni wanted to purchase the shares of "John Mill" of Agra. He took the services of Mr. Kali Nath for this purpose. 2. On 10th July, 1946 with the aid of Mr. Kali Nath, Hira Lal Patni along with one another purchased the entire interest of one Major A.U. Khan. 3. After seeking the permission U/S. 12 of Letters Patent Act, Mr. Kali Nath filed a suit No. 3718.47 against Hira Lal Patni in Bombay High Court for the recovery of his commission amounting to one Lakh Rupees. 4. High Court referred the dispute to an arbitrator namely Mr. W.E. Pereira, who was the administrator of the property of the deceased Major A.U. John. 5. The defendant cont...